Connect with us

Published

on


This 12 months will likely be remembered for the slew of recall efforts in opposition to officers in Ionia and Montcalm counties on a wide range of matters starting from wind and {solar} energy to funds points to wastewater remedy.

On Monday, sufficient signatures have been filed in opposition to three Douglass Township Board members associated to the wind ordinance controversy in that township to put the recall on the November poll.

A complete of 239 signatures have been wanted to provoke a recall in opposition to Supervisor Terry Anderson, Clerk Ronda Snyder and Trustee Tom Jeppesen, and 355 signatures have been filed in opposition to Anderson, 356 have been filed in opposition to Snyder and 358 have been filed in opposition to Jeppesen, in accordance with the Montcalm County Clerk’s Workplace.

Anderson, Snyder and Jeppesen have till July 6 to problem the signatures. If they don’t, the recall election will happen within the Nov. 3 basic election. Anybody might file to run in opposition to the three township officers so long as they file a qualifying petition with sufficient required signatures.

The Douglass Township recall effort was initiated by township resident Ben Reynolds.

KEENE TOWNSHIP

In Ionia County’s Keene Township, Christine Hendrick of Saranac filed recall petitions on Might 31 in opposition to that township’s Supervisor Robert Simpson, Treasurer Kara Albert and trustees Harvey Midday and Corey Wojcik associated to that township’s {solar} ordinance.

Hendrick’s recall petitions filed with the Ionia County Clerk’s Workplace have been cc’d to Ohio-based legal professional Joshua Nolan who is thought for his work with residents in Montcalm County who need protecting/restrictive wind and {solar} ordinances.

Hendrick’s recall petition cites the rationale for recall as follows: “On or about March 8, 2022, (Simpson, Albert, Midday and Wojcik) voted in favor of Ordinance 3-8-22 amending the zoning rules for {solar} energy programs in Keene Township.”

“There’s zero protections so far as setbacks,” Hendrick informed the Day by day Information. “By the point the general public came upon what was happening, we had missed our seven-day window for doing a referendum. Mainly our solely shot is to attempt to substitute the board and get a board that may work with the general public with an ordinance that may shield the well being, security and welfare of the neighborhood.”

Invenergy LLC is actively working to develop a {solar} challenge in Keene Township. The township board initially permitted a {solar} ordinance in 2018 and voted to amend it this previous March. Go to www.keenetownship.org to view the township’s {solar} ordinance and amendments.

Simpson informed the Day by day Information that the information of the recall effort caught him abruptly.

“I’m undecided I agree with why persons are doing it,” he stated. “It’s not just like the township did something secretively.”

Simpson added that the township may have an informational assembly at 7 p.m. June 23 at Saranac Excessive College on the subject of {solar} energy that includes representatives from Invenergy, Shoppers Energy and Michigan State College Extension.

“I’m hoping this informational assembly will assist reply some questions,” he stated.

The Ionia County Election Fee will assessment the Keene Township recall petitions at 10 a.m. on June 15 on a second ground multipurpose room of the Ionia County Courthouse, and can assessment recall petitions in opposition to Belding Metropolis Council members on the similar time.

CITY OF BELDING

On Might 27, Daniel DeGeest of Belding filed recall petitions in opposition to Belding Mayor Bruce Meyers and Councilwoman Bonita Steele alleging their “failure to make sure the wastewater remedy lagoons have been correctly maintained, leading to fines from (the Michigan Division of) Setting, Nice Lakes and Energy (EGLE).”

DeGeest hooked up a Day by day Information article from Dec. 14, 2021, titled “Belding To Focus on Wastewater Remedy Plant Fines; Council is Planning a Closed Session Assembly on Dec. 21.” That story detailed how the town was a attainable high-quality of $5,800 value of prices incurred by EGLE when investigating the town’s wastewater remedy plant, in addition to a attainable penalty charge of $128,000 associated to the plant.

The Day by day Information wrote a follow-up story on that matter on Dec. 24, 2021, which reported that the Metropolis Council went into closed session with the town’s legal professional from the Varnum legislation agency and engineering and structure agency Fleis & Vandenbrink for nearly an hour to debate EGLE’s administrative consent order associated to the wastewater remedy plant. The Metropolis Council voted in open session to have their legal professional negotiate with EGLE concerning the fines.

On March 1, the Metropolis Council voted to have their legal professional proceed to barter with EGLE. On March 15, Metropolis Supervisor Jon Stoppels reported that EGLE accepted the town’s supply of $104,000 to be paid over a five-year interval.

“They’re getting fined for it and it’s leeching into our rivers,” DeGeest informed the Day by day Information concerning his causes for the recall effort.

Meyers informed the Day by day Information he’s by no means met or spoken with DeGeest.

“I’m right here to offer again to the town of Belding and when the town of Belding believes that I’m not giving again or doing what I must do, that’s as much as them,” Meyers stated. “It’s nothing that I’m going to be anxious about. I’m targeted on the long run and transferring ahead.”

The Ionia County Election Fee will assessment the Belding recall petitions at 10 a.m. June 15 on a second ground multipurpose room of the Ionia County Courthouse, and can assessment recall petitions in opposition to Keene Township Board members on the similar time.

OTHER RECALLS

In different pending recall information:

• OTISCO TOWNSHIP: Cara Johnson of Belding filed recall petitions in opposition to Otisco Township Supervisor Desmond Pike and Treasurer Paula Byrne for causes associated to that township’s funds course of. The Ionia County Election Fee permitted the recall petitions on Might 18. Johnson is now within the strategy of accumulating signatures – she should acquire at the very least 260 signatures, which is 25% of the final gubernatorial vote in that township.

• MAPLE VALLEY TOWNSHIP: This township’s Supervisor John Schwandt will likely be on the Nov. 3 poll for a recall effort involving that township’s controversial wind ordinance. That recall effort was initiated by township resident Robin Poulsen.

• WINFIELD TOWNSHIP: The Montcalm County Election Fee denied recall petitions filed in opposition to all 5 Winfield Township Board members by township resident Dave Meyers associated to that township’s controversial wind ordinance. No new petitions have been filed presently.

• SIDNEY TOWNSHIP: Erik Benko, the founding father of Montcalm County Residents United, a Fb-based group “advocating in opposition to the irresponsible and invasive placement of business wind generators and {solar} arrays in Montcalm County,” was elected to the Sidney Township Board on Might 3, ousting trustee Jed Welder who was recalled in a 63% to 32% margin associated to that township’s wind ordinance.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wind Power

Windy promises don’t rate in the real world: Energy Security Board

Published

on

Swiss wind park ordered to scale back to protect birds


Credit score:  Jacob Greber, Senior correspondent |

Monetary Evaluate |

Jun 23, 2022 |

www.afr.com
~~

Victorian Energy Minister Lily D’Ambrosio’s assurances that offshore wind would offer a backstop to the energy market are undermined by the real-world expertise of capability markets around the globe.

Proof printed by the Energy Safety Board this week exhibits that operators of capability mechanisms within the UK, Eire and US routinely impose severely diminished reliability rankings on wind and {solar} mills

Based mostly on the figures offered by the ESB, Victoria’s bold future offshore wind energy capability might be “derated” to as little as 6.3 per cent – which is what the UK market asserts – and not more than 33 per cent, as per California’s instance.

Against this, coal and gasoline mills obtain rankings of between 79 per cent and 100 per cent – underscoring their reliability.

“Wind and {solar} alternatively could make solely a minimal contribution,” wrote specialists within the ESB’s report, which additionally questioned the reliability of hydropower.

“Storage and hydro also can obtain a variety of derating elements depending on the extent of storage and their controllability in the course of the compliance intervals e.g. run of river hydro will not be dispatchable.”

The report’s proof provides stress on Ms D’Ambrosio to assist an answer for the East Coast energy market, also called the Nationwide Energy Market (NEM).

Amid rocketing costs and an unprecedented regulatory suspension of the NEM final week, federal, state and territory energy ministers agreed to press forward with designing a mechanism that will see energy customers pay mills to take care of spare capability.

However opposition from Victoria and the ACT – which each have daring renewable energy targets – to backing fossil gas energy mills threatens to derail the method and depart the NEM susceptible to future shocks. Any new system requires approval by each jurisdictions, plus the Commonwealth, South Australia, Tasmania, NSW and Queensland.

Ms D’Ambrosio, whose authorities faces a state election in November, hit again this week at warnings Victoria faces blackouts throughout so-called “renewables droughts” in winter months.

She mentioned the state’s new offshore wind initiatives “will blow any shortfall out of the water”.

“We’ll convey on-line at the very least 2 gigawatts of offshore wind by 2032, sufficient to energy 1.5 million houses, with the potential to assist an infinite 13GW of capability by 2050 – 5 instances the state’s present renewable energy technology,” she mentioned.

Danny Value, managing director of Frontier Economics, mentioned Victoria’s place was unfeasible.

“It’s nonsense to suppose you could reliably provide a contemporary financial system with wind and {solar},” he mentioned. “The sheer quantity and price of batteries is breathtaking. It’s tens and tens of billions of {dollars} for Victoria.”

Mr Value famous that the Victorian authorities has adopted a populist stance prior to now and blocked the market regulator’s determination to dispatch energy to NSW throughout earlier crises.

“If she doesn’t wish to hold coal, that’s high-quality, however she will be able to’t additionally then ask for the opposite states to again her up when issues go unhealthy,” Mr Value mentioned.

Ms D’Ambrosia’s forecast wind capability figures assume that energy will all the time be out there in full and on the proper instances. Abroad capability markets exhibit the complexity of making an attempt to consider renewable sources.

The California Impartial System Operator (CAISO) assigns wind energy a derating issue of 8 per cent to 33 per cent, implying the energy supply is dependable on one in 12 days and no multiple in three days.

On the opposite facet of the US, the PJM – one of many world’s largest built-in wholesale energy markets taking in 13 states and the District of Columbia – assigns wind a derating issue of simply 15 per cent.

Within the UK, the determine is even decrease, at 6.3 per cent, whereas in Western Australia it ranges from 7 per cent to twenty-eight per cent.

Energy specialists proceed to debate the “derating elements” of renewable energy as a result of there’s appreciable disagreement over the best way to measure their reliability.

A part of the issue is that lots of the world’s present capability markets have been designed in an period when all of the dominant sources of energy technology – mainly coal, gasoline, nuclear and a few hydro – have been out there 100 per cent of the time.

“In energy programs with coal and gasoline, and a little bit of renewables, we mainly need to hold about 25 per cent capability in reserve to make up for all of the issues that go flawed,” Mr Value mentioned. “And issues do go flawed, even in an excellent energy system.”

“In a system that’s principally renewable, you’re approaching having to have near a 100 per cent reserve margin.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Wind Power

Essex, Suffolk and Norfolk pylon proposal could hit house prices ‘by a third’

Published

on

Swiss wind park ordered to scale back to protect birds


Credit score:  Pylon plan may hit home costs in Essex, Suffolk and Norfolk ‘by a 3rd’ |

BBC Information |

www.bbc.co.uk
~~

An property agent has warned home costs may fall by a 3rd if a 112-mile pylon scheme to hold offshore wind energy by way of East Anglia is accepted.

Paul Beresford, chief govt officer of Essex-based Beresfords, mentioned the proposal was already impacting property gross sales.

Campaigners mentioned the thought was “horrific”, whereas some residents have claimed it was “horrible”.

Nationwide Grid mentioned it was trying to hit authorities green energy targets.

Mr Beresford mentioned: “There have been research previously that as a lot as a 3rd of the property’s worth will be affected.

“It’s simply such a retrograde step. Why on earth would you be placing pylons up at the moment?

“It’s one thing from the final century – there are much better choices. We simply don’t must blight the gorgeous countryside with pylons.

“In fact everyone desires to see green energy however not at the price of scarring the panorama.”

Kevin Pallett, of Roxwell, close to Chelmsford, lives near the proposed route of the pylons.

He mentioned: “The considered having 50-metre metal pylons proper outdoors our backdoor isn’t a lovely proposition.

“What’s most irritating in regards to the proposal is that underground and offshore routes weren’t even thought of absolutely as a part of the session.”

A session interval ended on 16 June and a petition has been launched and councils have come out in opposition.

Nationwide Grid mentioned elevated renewable calls for by 2030 meant present energy traces didn’t have the capability.

It has proposed to run the cables underground by way of the Dedham Vale space of excellent pure magnificence on the Essex/Suffolk border.

The publicly-listed utility firm mentioned there could be one other alternative to touch upon the proposals earlier than an utility was submitted to the Planning Inspectorate in late 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wind Power

Cumberland County restricting, not banning wind power in Wentworth, N.S.

Published

on

Swiss wind park ordered to scale back to protect birds


WENTWORTH, N.S. – Cumberland County goes to limit the event of huge wind generators within the Wentworth Valley, however has opted to not ban them altogether.

Cumberland municipal council’s proposed modifications to its land-use bylaws relating to wind generators handed second studying throughout its June session on Wednesday. However as a substitute of a 3.5-kilometre ban on wind generators on either side of Freeway 4 within the valley, council has opted to limit improvement to three.2 kilometres on either side.

“I have a look at the place we had been a yr in the past, the dimensions of those generators, their energy and the way the group views them, we knew we needed to change the foundations to guard the group and I consider it is a good compromise,” Mayor Murray Scott stated following the assembly. “We’re a county that helps renewable energy and that features wind generators in the proper locations.”

Scott stated there has all the time been a priority concerning the decommissioning of wind generators as soon as they attain the top of their lifecycle.

“There will likely be a surety in place in order that when they’re not usable, there’ll be the flexibility to take them down,” Scott stated. “We’ve additionally addressed their distance from properties by extending the setbacks.

“We’ve been at this for months and I feel we’ve reached a degree the place we’re at a compromise that’s respectful of landowners and residents and, on the finish of the day, these corporations, who need to put generators within the county, must come to us. There’ll be an opportunity to query them on it and ensure they observe the foundations.”

Beneath the modifications, the setback between generators and dwellings is being elevated from 600 metres to 1,000 metres (or a kilometre).

There may be additionally a mandate for minimal public engagement necessities and decommissioning bonds for brand new generators.

Final week, throughout a public listening to, county councillors had been informed their proposed restricted overlay of three.5 kilometres from either side of Freeway 4 by the valley would make a deliberate wind farm on Higgins Mountain much less viable.

At concern, is a plan by builders to put a 100-megawatt wind farm on Higgins Mountain. The county positioned a six-month moratorium on wind initiatives again in January whereas it up to date its land-use bylaws.

The venture has been opposed by the residents’ group Shield Wentworth Valley, which stated the generators would influence the world’s ecosystem in addition to the inhabitants of the endangered mainland moose.

Earlier this week, Dan Eaton, director of venture improvement for Elemental Energy on behalf of Higgins Mountain Wind Farm Restricted Partnership, wrote the county proposing a change to the overlay that permits them to proceed whereas responding to resident considerations.

“Neighborhood help and social licence are extremely vital to our partnership. Our strategy has all alongside been to search out widespread floor with the group and as we speak we’re requesting that council settle for a compromise to the restricted overlay developed as a part of the Cumberland County wind turbine bylaw evaluate,” Eaton stated in a letter to county CAO Greg Herrett.

Eaton stated through the public listening to that the Higgins Mountain partnership is conscious of group considerations and has already self-imposed a 2.5-kilometre buffer from Freeway 4. It has accomplished an evaluation of the three.5-kilometre buffer and recommended the three.2-kilometre buffer as a substitute.

“Whereas there are usually not insignificant monetary impacts of extending the buffer from 2.5 kilometres to three.2 kilometres, we’re assured that at this distance the venture maintains its feasibility whereas making certain that the vital visible aesthetics of the Wentworth Valley, prioritized by the group, are maintained,” Eaton stated in his letter. “Higgins Mountain Wind Farm Restricted Partnership additionally re-iterates its prolonged dedication to not putting generators inside the zone of visible influence restriction as introduced on Dec. 4, 2021 at our second open home.”

Paul Pynn, representing the wind venture, stated Thursday the partnership is appreciative of the chance to take part within the course of.

“Higgins Wind has all the time been dedicated to growing our venture in a accountable method that respects the distinctiveness of the Wentworth Valley and the pursuits of the group,” Pynn stated in an emailed assertion. “With the adjustment to the restricted overlay, we anticipate that the venture is ready to meet or exceed all necessities within the amended Cumberland County Wind Turbine Bylaw and can reduce potential results to the visible aesthetics of the Wentworth Valley.

“We stay up for persevering with to work with the Mi’kmaq Nations, Municipality of Cumberland, Municipality of Colchester in addition to residents and group stakeholders to advance the venture by a provincial environmental evaluation and municipal allowing processes permitting Higgins Wind to construct a venture that may assist Nova Scotia Energy ship clear, dependable and reasonably priced energy whereas offering significant financial advantages to the communities inside which we work.

Coun. Kathy Redmond, who represents the Wentworth space on council and opposed the preliminary venture plan, stated she will dwell with the compromise.

“I’m glad there may be safety for the Wentworth Valley,” Redmond stated. “Regardless that it’s dropping down to three.2, that’s solely 300 metres in distinction. I feel with what we have now in place now, we have now an excellent bylaw.”

Redmond stated she nonetheless questions whether or not the corporate will be capable of “conceal” the generators and never disturb the view of the valley, however she helps the compromise.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending