Connect with us

Published

on


Credit score:  NJ green energy: Activists fear wind generators will damage LBI tourism |

Amanda Oglseby |

Asbury Park Press |

Might 6, 2022 |

www.app.com
~~

Might offshore wind generators spoil the pristine views of the Atlantic Ocean from Lengthy Seaside Island and the area’s vacationer economic system?

Robert “Bob” Stern, founding father of Save LBI, a coalition fashioned to push proposed wind turbine tasks farther from shore, says New Jersey’s wind energy tasks, as they’re at the moment designed, will hurt each.

“Individuals come to this island to get that open vista, to flee, in a method, civilization and all of the muddle and noise,” the Seaside Haven resident mentioned.

Lengthy Seaside Island is sort of a totally different world from the hustle of mainland residing, a spot with cooler summer time breezes and pure views of seashores and ocean, Stern mentioned.

However all that’s in danger, he mentioned, by putting wind generators within the view of vacationers and beachgoers.

Why wind generators?

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy needs 7,500 megawatts of offshore wind energy to be generated for the state’s electric grid by the 12 months 2035. It’s a part of the governor’s plan to cut back carbon emissions, decrease the state’s reliance on fossil fuels, and try to sluggish local weather change throughout the area.

In consequence, New Jersey has dedicated to buying electrical energy generated by wind generators that will likely be constructed throughout a number of ocean lease areas underneath the administration of the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Administration.

Three lease areas have to this point been permitted to be developed off New Jersey’s southern Atlantic coast: Ocean Wind I and II and Atlantic Shores.

The northernmost of the three tasks, Atlantic Shores, would have a wind turbine space that might be 8.7 miles from shore at its closest method from Atlantic Metropolis. The lease space would have 200 generators, every stretching 1,049 toes tall, or roughly as tall because the Eiffel Tower. In keeping with Bureau of Ocean Energy Administration mission particulars, the wind generators can be seen from seashores alongside Lengthy Seaside Island.

Stern, of Save LBI, mentioned that 80% of the generators closest to shore will likely be seen above the horizon, regardless of being practically 10 miles away.

These large constructions, as soon as full, will drive the island’s vacationers away, he mentioned.

Save LBI organized a survey of native vacationers and located that about half wouldn’t return to the island as soon as the wind generators had been seen, Stern mentioned.

“It’s not low cost to hire the place on the island for the summer time,” he mentioned. “I feel many individuals, in a method, really feel a bit of cheated in the event that they put down all that cash after which they go to the seaside, and so they have to take a look at industrial constructions.”

Stern’s considerations are shared by Duane Watlington, founding father of Trip Leases Jersey Shore, a trip residence rental web site with about 1,500 listings in Lengthy Seaside Island.

“It’s going to make my job a heck of rather a lot more durable to attempt to assist these house owners hire their homes out,” Watlington mentioned. “You need to have wind energy, high quality, however don’t put it the place it’s going to spoil tourism.”

Affect to greater than LBI

In 2018, a survey of greater than 1,700 beachgoers by the College of Delaware discovered that 1 in 5 respondents mentioned their seaside go to can be worsened by wind generators situated 12.5 miles offshore. The generators within the survey had been smaller, simply 574 toes excessive, then the 1,049-foot excessive generators proposed by Atlantic Shores.

With generators about 12.5 miles offshore, the researchers estimated that seaside journeys to the world would drop by 8%.

The researchers additionally discovered that putting generators near shore – 7.5 miles or much less – would seemingly end in an financial loss for a seaside neighborhood.

The impacts will likely be felt all alongside the Jersey Shore, not simply in Lengthy Seaside Island, mentioned Watlington, of Trip Leases Jersey Shore.

“It’s going to affect just about all of the Shore locations, in the event that they put these that shut,” he mentioned. “It is a risk to this trade, to my enterprise, to anyone that depends on tourism on the shore. It is a risk, and we have to get up to it.”

Tim Feeney, who owns a house within the Holgate part of Lengthy Seaside Township, agrees.

“For generations beachgoers have come to the Shore to benefit from the extensive open seascape, which they contemplate the state’s pure treasure,” he mentioned in an electronic mail. “The Shore is our Berkshires, Adirondacks or Yosemite.”

The generators would quantity to a “desecration” of the world’s pure magnificence, he mentioned.

Counter: A boon for the area

Not everybody within the tourism trade agrees that wind generators will hurt the native economic system.

Larry Sieg, president and CEO of Meet AC, Atlantic Metropolis’s promoter of company occasions and conventions, says the offshore wind trade will likely be a boon for the area.

“We lately hosted the Enterprise Community for Offshore Wind 2022 Worldwide Partnering Discussion board in Atlantic Metropolis, which was an enormous success not just for the Atlantic Metropolis economic system, but additionally for the wind and energy industries that signed main enterprise offers all through the convention,” Sieg mentioned in an electronic mail.

Michael Chait, president of the Better Atlantic Metropolis Chamber, mentioned New Jersey is shortly changing into “the guts of America’s offshore wind trade.

“Atlantic Metropolis has innumerable potentialities with regards to financial and jobs growth,” he mentioned in an electronic mail. “With regard to tourism, which in fact is a main a part of our economic system, we imagine that offshore wind and our tourism enterprise can coexist. In reality, we’re optimistic that offshore wind may very well enhance tourism by bringing in a completely new assemblage of tourists to our area.”

However Ric Bertsch, an Ocean Metropolis resident and member of the group Defend Our Coast NJ, which opposes the wind tasks as they’re at the moment designed, mentioned he worries in regards to the impacts to communities like his personal.

“It’s Cape Might County. We’ve got… fishing and tourism,” he mentioned. “We’ve got no different trade. We don’t have every other giant enterprise right here.”

He mentioned the county will endure the results of New Jersey’s new experiment with offshore wind generators, which is able to hurt the vacationer expertise and block giant swaths of ocean from industrial fishing.

“The one model (in Ocean Metropolis) that we now have to supply the world is our old style values, our quiet, our peaceable place to be,” mentioned Suzanne Hornick, additionally of Ocean Metropolis and main member of Defend Our Coast NJ. “This (wind turbine mission) actually screws with our model.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Wind Power

Crowding the skies | Wind Energy News

Published

on

Swiss wind park ordered to scale back to protect birds


Credit score:  Impression of wind energy on golden eagles heard by Carbon County commissioners |

By Joshua Wooden |

The Saratoga Solar |

Could 19, 2022 |

www.saratogasun.com
~~

As wind energy initiatives proceed to blow into northern Carbon County, varied entities have sought to find out the impacts it has or may have on wildlife.

In 2021, the Board of Carbon County Commissioners (BOCCC) had thought-about a moratorium on any energy initiatives within the Shirley Basin space. The dialogue of this moratorium got here following a presentation from the Wyoming Recreation and Fish Division relating to a research of wind energy challenge impacts on the Medication Bow Pronghorn Herd Unit. That moratorium finally failed on a 2-3 vote.

On Could 3, one other presentation was made earlier than the county commissioners. This one was made by Mike Lockhart—a former worker of the US Fish and Wildlife Service—relating to impacts on golden eagles. Lockhart, who labored for 33 years for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, mentioned he was conducting the research on behalf of his former employer and the US Geological Service.

“Wind energy in Carbon and Albany counties is already very in depth … and it’s already inflicting substantial hurt to golden eagles and different wildlife that’s largely missed. Personally, I’m against any new energy improvement in these areas,” mentioned Lockhart. “I feel there’s sufficient and there are greater than ample locations in different elements of the US that may help wind enlargement with out threatening excessive wildlife values.”

The golden eagle is essentially the most broadly distributed species of eagle, starting from the northernmost a part of Alaska down into Mexico. In accordance with Lockhart, the Shirley Basin and Laramie Basin are a very powerful areas in North America for the raptor.

“One of many issues we’ve decided, completely, is that Shirley Basin and Laramie Basin are maybe the 2 most vital focal areas for Golden Eagles within the nation. They’re massively vital they usually help a resident breeding inhabitants, a non-breeding resident inhabitants,” Lockhart mentioned. “Additionally they function a migration hall and help over-wintering birds by way of the winter.”

A big raptor, an grownup golden eagle ranges in measurement from 26 to 40 inches in size and has a wingspan between 5 ft, 11 inches and seven ft, 8 inches. In accordance with Lockhart, roughly 113 golden eagles had been captured and collared with both a PowerTrain Know-how (PTT) collar or a International System for Cellular Communication (GSM) collar. The previous is the standard radio collar which tracks actions whereas the latter can present extra information, however solely uploads that information when in proximity of a mobile tower. Of the raptors which had been collared, 80 of them had been related to wind energy initiatives, mentioned Lockhart.

The knowledge gathered to this point has proven the three largest mortality components for golden eagles have been car collisions, windmill strikes and electrocution. In accordance with Lockhart, it was nonetheless unclear as to why windmill strikes had been occurring with golden eagles. One speculation he introduced up, nevertheless, referenced actions within the southwest through which folks had been in a position to fly planes subsequent to or close to golden eagles and shoot the raptors. Lockhart mentioned he believed as a result of the golden eagle had advanced to be the “hardest issues within the air” they weren’t afraid of anything within the air.

Lockhart was not shy about his criticism of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service throughout his presentation. A number of occasions he mentioned the entity was fiercely protecting of golden eagles when he labored for them however had appeared to grow to be much less involved of their survival with reference to wind energy initiatives. The questions he had relating to the entity’s involvement with wind energy initiatives included:

• How are they addressing golden eagle mortalities with wind energy?

• How are they serving to to website wind energy farms away from excessive worth habitats for eagles?

• How are they wanting on the impact of clustered wind farms on Golden Eagles?

“It’s an fascinating query and, sadly, it’s one which I feel they’re doing a particularly poor job on and have punted on the entire problem of eagles and wind energy,” mentioned Lockhart. “Their administration relies completely retroactively.”

In 2016, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service—beneath the Obama Administration—up to date federal tips to permit for wind energy corporations to function excessive pace generators for as much as 30 years. Whereas wind and different energy corporations might kill as much as 4,200 bald eagles annually with out penalty, golden eagles might solely be killed if companites took steps to reduce losses based on a Could 4, 2016 Related Press article.

In accordance with Lockhart, continued development of wind energy improvement within the Shirley and Laramie basins could be additional detrimental to the golden eagle populations which both lived round or used these areas. He instructed the commissioners most golden eagle nests usually had one egg, because the golden eagle doesn’t usually lay a number of eggs.

Data from the Audubon Society states golden eagles will usually lay between one and three eggs, however by no means 4 or extra eggs. Lockhart additionally mentioned the golden eagle ages slower than most different birds. The primary time younger golden eagles take their first flight, based on the Audubon Society, is when they’re about 60 to 70 days previous. Golden eagles are among the many longest residing raptors on the planet, with some having lived so long as 31 years in North America.

As a result of restricted variety of eggs golden eagles lay and the longevity of the species, Lockhart instructed the BOCCC he believed the general affect of wind energy initiatives within the basins could be detrimental. Including he believed the federal authorities didn’t wish to tackle this problem, he mentioned he believed the commissioners had been one of many decision-making our bodies which might take this info under consideration.

Whereas sympathizing with Lockhart, the commissioners said a bigger consideration of their position was that of personal property rights. Different issues, particularly on the state degree, included encroachment of wind energy initiatives on core sage grouse areas, based on Commissioner John Espy.

The Board of Carbon County Commissioners may have met on Could 17.

The following assembly of the Board of Carbon County Commissioners might be at 9 a.m. on June 7 on the Carbon Constructing – Courthouse Annex in Rawlins.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wind Power

Eminent domain bill won’t stop Grain Belt

Published

on

Swiss wind park ordered to scale back to protect birds


Credit score:  By Greg Kozol |

Information-Press NOW |

St. Joseph Information-Press |

www.newspressnow.com
~~

Ted Rogers stands close to his entrance porch and gazes previous the lengthy gravel driveway that stretches out to State Route A. The Buchanan County farmer says, to nobody specifically, “it’s coming.”

Nothing that occurred on this yr’s legislative session modifications his premonition concerning the Grain Belt Categorical and its affect on the home that his mother and father moved into in 1955. He’s lived there since 1984.

“It’s going to run proper previous the home,” Rogers mentioned. “Let’s simply say we’re apprehensive.”

Grain Belt Categorical is a high-voltage, direct-current transmission line that can ship wind energy from western Kansas to inhabitants facilities east of the Mississippi River. Its 780-mile route cuts by eight counties in north Missouri, together with a few of the 230 acres that Rogers farms close to Faucett. Landowners like Rogers have fought the undertaking for greater than a decade at county fee conferences, with state utility regulators and within the Missouri Common Meeting. They have been notably incensed that Invenergy Transmission, a non-public firm in Chicago, might use eminent area to construct Grain Belt.

This spring, the legislature handed a invoice that clamps down on the usage of eminent area for transmission strains. The laws, now headed to the governor’s desk, requires an organization or an investor-owned utility to pay 150% of market worth for an easement on agricultural property. It additionally requires a undertaking to ship a proportional quantity of energy to Missouri in order that it doesn’t simply use rural counties as an energy superhighway on the way in which to greater cities.

However Home Invoice 2005 contained the next phrases: “These provisions won’t apply to functions filed previous to Aug. 28, 2022.”

Meaning Grain Belt, granted regulatory approval in 2019, is grandfathered in.

“We thank our many supporters for his or her tireless efforts in making certain that this laws acknowledged the authorized rights of Grain Belt Categorical as a beforehand authorized undertaking that can proceed ahead towards full building,” mentioned Nicole Luckey, senior vice chairman of regulatory affairs for Invenergy, in an announcement. “Missouri lawmakers introduced stakeholders collectively round this vital legislative compromise, which is able to profit Missouri households, farmers, staff and companies for many years to return.”

That’s not how Rogers sees it.

“I’ve a tough time with the Legislature proper now,” he mentioned.

Bittersweet victory

Missouri Farm Bureau helped lead the push for modifications to Missouri’s eminent area legal guidelines. Garrett Hawkins, the president of Missouri Farm Bureau, mentioned the invoice’s passage represents a bittersweet victory as a result of it marks a step ahead for safeguarding landowners and making certain extra of a public profit, particularly with multi-state transmission tasks involving for-profit corporations.

Nevertheless it has little affect on the one undertaking that began the controversy.

“What we are able to say with certainty is that the combat that was led by these landowners, coupled with our group and others, has put Missouri in a stronger place as we glance to the way forward for energy transmission,” he mentioned. “When future tasks come, we all know that Missouri should obtain a profit for a undertaking to ensure that eminent area authority to be granted.”

Grain Belt will affect 570 landowners in Missouri. It has additionally began to take reluctant landowners to court docket, submitting condemnation petitions to achieve involuntary easements to their property. In April, a Buchanan County choose granted Grain Belt’s petition of condemnation in opposition to Bradley Horn of Gower. Horn couldn’t be reached and his legal professional didn’t return a name for remark.

Invenergy mentioned it has reached voluntary agreements on 74% of the route in Kansas and Missouri and has made court docket filings “as a final resort” on 14 thus far.

One of many largest factors of rivalry about Grain Belt is whether or not the transmission line gives sufficient public profit to justify the usage of eminent area to take non-public property. The undertaking will transfer 4,000-megawatts of electrical energy from Kansas to the Indiana border. It’s a direct-current line, so the ability can’t be transferred to the native grid with no converter station.

Hawkins mentioned he doesn’t assume Grain Belt would have been capable of meet the proportional profit necessities outlined in HB 2005. These new guidelines, for instance, would require 25% of the ability to be supplied to Missouri if 25% of the strains undergo the state.

“We must always not simply be a pass-through hall for a undertaking,” Hawkins mentioned.

The Grain Belt undertaking first proposed 500 megawatts of the transmission line’s capability for Missouri. Invenergy now says a mixed 2,500 megawatts will go to Kansas and Missouri.

“Grain Belt Categorical will present no less than $12 million in annual energy financial savings to Missourians throughout the state whereas strengthening America’s energy independence by connecting hundreds of thousands of shoppers to domestically produced, inexpensive and dependable energy,” the corporate mentioned.

A glance forward

One factor either side agree on is that the eminent area invoice may have a much bigger impact on future tasks.

Hawkins mentioned rural communities aren’t against green energy. This received’t be the primary time some firm desires to generate wind energy within the Nice Plains and promote it out east. These caught in between deserve some safety, he mentioned.

“This grid that we take pleasure in has been constructed on the backs of farmers and landowners for many years,” he mentioned. “As the way forward for energy transmission unfolds earlier than us and as extra tasks come down the road, we’re not going to face in the way in which of energy safety. We must always count on and are owed a extra stage taking part in subject in negotiations.”

Hawkins mentioned he is aware of grid operators are extra high-voltage transmission tasks in Missouri.

Rogers isn’t wanting on the massive image. He’s simply looking to the horizon, the place 150-foot poles could possibly be erected on his property. He wonders what the long run holds for his farm, his property and his life.

“Farming, it’s in my blood. All the time has been,” he mentioned. “There’s nothing else that mattered. I don’t assume we might reside on the town.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Wind Power

Wind turbine decision could be left to voters this fall

Published

on

Swiss wind park ordered to scale back to protect birds


Credit score:  By A.J. Kaufman – For the Inquirer |

Galion Inquirer |

Might 20, 2022 |
www.galioninquirer.com
~~

CRAWFORD COUNTY – Crawford County commissioners not too long ago voted to pause wind farm improvement throughout the county and return the choice to voters.

The decision halts building of Apex Clear Energy’s 300-megawatt wind farm, which was anticipated to incorporate roughly 60 generators.

In a 2-1 end result, Commissioner Doug Weisenauer voted towards the measure, whereas Commissioners Tim Ley and Larry Schmidt supported the proscribing decision.

The members’ newfound energy emanates from Ohio Senate Invoice 52, which grew to become legislation final summer season, enabling county commissioners to make selections about wind farm improvement, as an alternative of township trustees or the state’s Energy Siting Board in Columbus.

“I voted to limit it, just because it permits Crawford County to hunt approval from the voters. These folks can communicate,” Ley defined partially. “Three folks had been being requested to talk for the entire 40,000 folks in Crawford County. There are a lot of professional and anti-wind folks, so how on the earth can three commissioners take their constituents, juggle that feeling, and make an knowledgeable resolution that’s going to have an effect on 25,000 voters and their kids? We signify the farmers, non farmers, and all residents.”

Dozens of activists from the grassroots “Crawford Anti-Wind” group attended the Might 5 vote, after distributing petitions and attending public conferences for months throughout the county.

“Like Tim, I consider the residents must be making that decision,” Schmidt mentioned. “To get it on the poll, they need to get the petitions on the market. There are some folks harassing the petitioners, which I discover disturbing. I want to see it up for a vote…I encourage everybody who’d like an opportunity to vote on it to signal the petition.”

If petitions are filed, it forces a November referendum on the problem that would overrule the commissioners’ actions. These petitions should be filed by June 4 and signed by 8 % of the votes solid within the earlier gubernatorial election, equaling about 1,200. If a petition will not be filed, the commissioners’ decision goes into impact.

Ley additionally emphasised that if folks need to see the measure on the poll, they should signal the petition, no matter their place, or the choice is made by Columbus. The three commissioners say they had been the primary to signal the petition.

Weisenauer’s objection to the choice is about overstepping authority “by usurping the house rule authority of the residents and the township trustees.” He deemed it authorities overreach into property house owners’ rights.

Apex has leased land for a number of years in northern Crawford County for “Honey Creek Wind.” Builders would make annual funds, per megawatt, to Crawford county every year, anticipated to generate $2.7 million. The Virginia-based firm is irked by the choice.

“The Crawford County resolution to make the county a wind energy exclusion zone got here as an amazing disappointment to us and the tons of of landowners who’ve been trying ahead to internet hosting Honey Creek Wind amenities on their personal property,” Apex Public Engagement Supervisor Julie Drenner instructed the Inquirer. “Those that consider {that a} resolution about their personal property rights ought to go on to the voters, relatively than be determined by county commissioners, have the chance to signal an official petition requesting that the query be placed on the November poll.”

Linda Schulze of Bloomville worries about her quiet settings and pure wildlife being threatened.

“Our neighbors do not need the appropriate to willingly hurt us,” she not too long ago wrote to the Inquirer. “These gigantic wind generators may ultimately show to be a tremendous supply of energy, however the first experiment with them must be in a a lot much less populated space. Till all the unwell results are decided, completely studied, and resolved, they should solely be constructed in remoted areas.”

Schulze additionally famous that noise from the generators, which can method skyscraper heights of 1,000 ft, could cause complications, nausea, sleep deprivation, and extra.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending